A poor woodman was felling a tree on a riverbank when his axe slipped from his hands and sank into the deep water. Dismayed, for the axe was his only means of livelihood, he sat down and wept. Hearing his cries, the god Mercury (the fleet-footed messenger of the gods, known for cleverness and also patron of traders) appeared. Mercury asked what the matter was. Upon hearing the loss, Mercury dove into the river and brought up a gleaming golden axe, asking if this was the woodman’s. Honest as he was, the woodman said, no, that was not his axe. Mercury dived again and emerged with a shining silver axe—“Is this yours?” Again the woodman shook his head no. A third time Mercury disappeared beneath the surface and then returned with a plain, well-worn iron axe. Overjoyed, the woodman exclaimed that this one was indeed his. Pleased by the man’s honesty (he had not claimed the precious ones), Mercury gifted him both the gold and silver axes in addition to his own. The woodman went home rejoicing.
News of this miracle spread, and a greedy neighbor, hearing it, decided to attempt the same. He deliberately went to the same spot and flung his own axe into the river, then wailed dramatically. Mercury appeared, and, suspecting the scheme but playing along, offered the man a golden axe first. The greedy fellow eagerly claimed it as his. At that, Mercury not only refused to give him the gold axe, but did not retrieve his own axe either, and then vanished—leaving the dishonest man with nothing. The moral: “Honesty is the best policy.” In a more nuanced sense, it teaches that integrity brings its own reward, while dishonesty will be punished or at least fail to prosper.
This fable directly champions honesty and contentment. The first woodman’s refusal to lie for gain shows virtue in practice. He is rewarded beyond expectation (a somewhat fairy-tale-like positive outcome that reinforces the moral), underlining an almost divine approval of integrity. Mercury’s role as a deity who tests mortals is akin to many folklore motifs where supernatural beings reward the good and expose the bad. In a way, Mercury in this story acts opposite to his usual trickster persona—instead, he becomes the arbiter of justice. The story affirms a belief in moral reciprocity: be truthful and you’ll be taken care of (maybe not with literal golden windfalls in reality, but in trust, reputation, peace of mind, etc.). Conversely, deceit may seem to offer shortcuts to wealth but ultimately backfires.
Philosophically, one can discuss virtue ethics here: the woodman values truth over immediate material gain—he could have easily lied and taken the gold axe, but his character prevented it. This suggests an internal moral compass more valuable than gold, which ironically then brings gold as a reward. It’s an alignment of virtue and reward common in fables aimed at teaching children or society that doing right is pragmatically wise too. Of course, reality is more complex—honesty sometimes doesn’t pay off so tangibly—but the fable’s simplicity is meant to encourage moral behavior by showing an ideal scenario of cosmic justice.
Historically, this story comes from Aesop (Perry Index #173, often titled “Mercury and the Woodman” or “The Honest Woodcutter”). It has been referenced through centuries and aligns with proverbs across cultures about honesty. A medieval variation of commentary even alluded to the lesson “a river doesn’t always bring back axes,” cautioning that not always is honesty immediately rewarded in life—but the fable’s spirit is optimistic. La Fontaine included it as well, giving it literary status in French. In some retellings (like Rabelais’s satirical version), imitators trying to replicate someone else’s miracle meet comically gruesome ends, amplifying the caution against greed further.
For modern audiences, the fable remains directly relevant in highlighting how temptations to cheat can arise but resisting them is virtuous. It could be applied to small everyday acts—like finding a wallet and returning it intact rather than taking the money—or larger ethical decisions. The greedy neighbor’s tactic of faking loss to get unearned gain is reminiscent of fraudulent schemes; the outcome implies eventual exposure and loss of credibility, if not worse.
The moral “Honesty is the best policy” not only suggests it’s ethically correct but strategically smartest. Over time, trustworthiness yields benefits (others trust you, help you, etc.), whereas dishonesty might yield a quick benefit but harm you in the long run (loss of trust, possible punishment). Mercury essentially performs an ethical experiment with clear results.
It’s worth noting this fable also touches on gratitude and contentment: the honest woodman was simply happy to retrieve his own axe; he did not lust after the gold or silver ones. That contentment is part of his virtue. The greedy neighbor, by contrast, wasn’t even content with his own axe—he wanted gold, and lost even the ordinary. So it also echoes the theme that grasping for more than what’s rightfully yours leads to ruin (similar to “The Dog and the Shadow” where greed loses the meat in hand).
In conclusion, Mercury and the Woodman beautifully illustrates through mythic example that integrity and honesty bring positive outcomes, whereas deceitful greed ultimately leads to loss. It reassures that even if no Mercurial figure hands out gold in real life, the principle stands: honesty yields the best outcomes in building a life and community, making it indeed the “best policy” to live by.
Leave a Reply